[ 01 ] D&AD Entry Platform

Services:
UX
preview of project with phone mockup
preview of project with phone mockup

In this project, I led the UX redesign of the D&AD Pro Awards Entry Site. My primary focus was on creating a seamless, user-centered experience that would streamline the awards submission process for creative professionals across the globe. By combining in-depth user research, iterative testing, and strategic collaboration with the design and development teams, I transformed the platform’s workflows to meet both user needs and business objectives.

Overview

The Project

The D&AD Pro Awards Entry Site is a vital portal for creatives and agencies worldwide, but user feedback indicated the need for modernization and a more intuitive interface. I set out to streamline the submission journey and refine the platform’s functionality, ensuring it could efficiently handle all types of users. From a creative freelancer entering one category to large agencies submitting over 100 entries each year. By leveraging user-centric research methods and iterative design improvements, my goal was to eliminate friction, optimize workflows, and deliver a seamless experience aligned with both user and business objectives.​​​​​​​


The Project

The D&AD Pro Awards Entry Site is a vital portal for creatives and agencies worldwide, but user feedback indicated the need for modernization and a more intuitive interface. I set out to streamline the submission journey and refine the platform’s functionality, ensuring it could efficiently handle all types of users. From a creative freelancer entering one category to large agencies submitting over 100 entries each year. By leveraging user-centric research methods and iterative design improvements, my goal was to eliminate friction, optimize workflows, and deliver a seamless experience aligned with both user and business objectives.​​​​​​​


Challenges

The biggest challenge was simplifying the submission process while accommodating hundreds of categories and subcategories, each with different application requirements. Despite this complexity, the platform needed to feel consistent and intuitive for all users.
What started as a two-month project evolved into a four-year iterative process as we uncovered the full complexity of the system. The Entry Site also had to seamlessly integrate with D&AD’s internal Logging System, ensuring that behind-the-scenes processes didn’t disrupt the user journey.


Challenges

The biggest challenge was simplifying the submission process while accommodating hundreds of categories and subcategories, each with different application requirements. Despite this complexity, the platform needed to feel consistent and intuitive for all users.
What started as a two-month project evolved into a four-year iterative process as we uncovered the full complexity of the system. The Entry Site also had to seamlessly integrate with D&AD’s internal Logging System, ensuring that behind-the-scenes processes didn’t disrupt the user journey.


Objectives

Streamline the submission process to make it faster and more intuitive.

  • Ensure a seamless experience for both freelancers submitting one entry and agencies managing over 100 applications.

  • Improve overall platform functionality while maintaining consistency across different award categories.

  • Facilitate integration with the internal Logging System without introducing complexity for users.

Objectives

Streamline the submission process to make it faster and more intuitive.

  • Ensure a seamless experience for both freelancers submitting one entry and agencies managing over 100 applications.

  • Improve overall platform functionality while maintaining consistency across different award categories.

  • Facilitate integration with the internal Logging System without introducing complexity for users.

By focusing on user research, usability testing, and scalable design, I worked to create a submission platform that is both efficient and adaptable.

By focusing on user research, usability testing, and scalable design, I worked to create a submission platform that is both efficient and adaptable.

Phase 1 — Discover

01 — User Interviews

Knowing the users

01 — User Interviews

Knowing the users

02 — Personas

Understanding the users

02 — Personas

Understanding the users

03 — User Journeys

Contextual experience

03 — User Journeys

Contextual experience

04 — Experience Collection

Inspirational content

04 — Experience Collection

Inspirational content

05 — Experience Review

Testing, analysis, data review of the current platform

05 — Experience Review

Testing, analysis, data review of the current platform

To create a more intuitive and efficient submission experience, I conducted extensive user research to understand the needs, frustrations, and behaviors of entrants using the D&AD Pro Awards Entry Site.

I conducted:

  • User interviews with freelancers, agencies, and returning applicants.

  • Surveys to gather insights on common frustrations and feature requests.

  • Competitor analysis & heuristic evaluation to identify industry best practices.

Through this research, I developed user personas and mapped user journeys to highlight key pain points. Some of the main findings included:

Through this research, I developed user personas and mapped user journeys to highlight key pain points. Some of the main findings included:

  • Category selection was overwhelming due to the number of options and lack of contextual guidance.

  • The submission process was complex and repetitive, requiring users to re-enter the same project details multiple times.

  • Pricing was a barrier for small entrants.

  • Pricing transparency needed improvement.

  • File submission specs lacked clarity, adding unnecessary friction to the process.

  • The payment model lacked flexibility, who often needed more time to finalize entries.

  • D&AD needed to encourage early submissions, as logging entries early made internal processes more manageable.

  • Adding credits was a time-consuming task, as users had to enter names manually, one by one.

  • Category selection was overwhelming due to the number of options and lack of contextual guidance.

  • The submission process was complex and repetitive, requiring users to re-enter the same project details multiple times.

  • Pricing was a barrier for small entrants.

  • Pricing transparency needed improvement.

  • File submission specs lacked clarity, adding unnecessary friction to the process.

  • The payment model lacked flexibility, who often needed more time to finalize entries.

  • D&AD needed to encourage early submissions, as logging entries early made internal processes more manageable.

  • Adding credits was a time-consuming task, as users had to enter names manually, one by one.

preview of project 2
preview of project 2

Phase 2 — Define

01 — MVP

What is the minimal viable product?

01 — MVP

What is the minimal viable product?

02 — Information Architecture

Understand the site content structure

02 — Information Architecture

Understand the site content structure

03 — Site Map

Define the site content structure

03 — Site Map

Define the site content structure

04 — Sketching

Explore the site content structure

04 — Sketching

Explore the site content structure

With key insights from the Discover phase, I transitioned into Phase 2 defining the structure and core functionality of the new platform. This phase focused on creating a clearer, more efficient submission experience by addressing the identified pain points.

To establish a strong foundation, I worked on:

  • MVP definition, prioritizing essential features to improve the submission flow.

  • Card sorting exercises, helping to create a logical and intuitive information architecture for the platform and main navigation

  • Information architecture & site mapping, ensuring structured navigation and content organization.

  • Early sketching & wireframing, exploring ways to simplify the entry process while maintaining flexibility for different user needs.

Key strategic improvements
  • Offering greater payment flexibility by allowing entrants to pay first and submit later, ensuring they could finalize entries within their internal approval timelines.

  • Encouraging early submissions through a tiered pricing model, balancing the needs of entrants with D&AD’s internal requirement to log entries progressively.

  • Improving the credit submission experience by making it faster and less repetitive, reducing frustration during this crucial step

This phase set the groundwork for a more intuitive, scalable, and user-friendly entry platform, ensuring consistency across all award categories while accommodating different user needs.

  • Offering greater payment flexibility by allowing entrants to pay first and submit later, ensuring they could finalize entries within their internal approval timelines.

  • Encouraging early submissions through a tiered pricing model, balancing the needs of entrants with D&AD’s internal requirement to log entries progressively.

  • Improving the credit submission experience by making it faster and less repetitive, reducing frustration during this crucial step

This phase set the groundwork for a more intuitive, scalable, and user-friendly entry platform, ensuring consistency across all award categories while accommodating different user needs.

Making category selection more intuitive by providing better guidance and contextual information, helping users quickly identify the most relevant categories.

  • Improving pricing transparency by displaying the total cost of all created entries upfront, allowing agencies and individuals to better estimate budgets before payment.

  • Introducing discount codes for freelancers and small agencies to remove pricing barriers and encourage wider participation.

  • Reducing repetition in the submission process by allowing users to reuse project details across multiple categories.

  • Clarifying file submission specs to remove uncertainty and eliminate unnecessary delays.

Making category selection more intuitive by providing better guidance and contextual information, helping users quickly identify the most relevant categories.

  • Improving pricing transparency by displaying the total cost of all created entries upfront, allowing agencies and individuals to better estimate budgets before payment.

  • Introducing discount codes for freelancers and small agencies to remove pricing barriers and encourage wider participation.

  • Reducing repetition in the submission process by allowing users to reuse project details across multiple categories.

  • Clarifying file submission specs to remove uncertainty and eliminate unnecessary delays.

Phase 3 — Ideate and Design

01 — Wireframes

Design of workflows

01 — Wireframes

Design of workflows

02 — Prototype

Simulate the product

02 — Prototype

Simulate the product

03 — Usability testing

Validate ideas

03 — Usability testing

Validate ideas

With a solid framework in place, I moved into Phase 3: Ideate & Design, where I translated research and strategy into interactive, user-tested prototypes.

Key activities included:

  • Wireframing & prototyping, refining layouts and user flows based on feedback.

  • Usability testing, validating improvements with real users to ensure clarity and efficiency.

  • Iterative design improvements, adjusting functionality and interactions to streamline the experience.

A major focus of this phase was ensuring feasibility. As the development team began building the core functionality, I worked closely with them to:

  • Validate technical constraints, ensuring that proposed solutions were achievable.

  • Align on UX best practices, maintaining consistency across the platform.

  • Refine complex workflows, such as bulk submissions for agencies and category-specific requirements.

By continuously iterating on user feedback and collaborating with developers, I ensured that the platform’s UX strategy translated smoothly into implementation.

Phase 4 — Design & Development

01 — UI Design

Make it visual

01 — UI Design

Make it visual

02 — Development

Build it

02 — Development

Build it

03 — User testing

Test and validate the platform

03 — User testing

Test and validate the platform

Once the core experience was finalized, the project moved into Phase 4: Visual Design and Development.
In this stage:

  • A UI designer refined the interface to enhance clarity and aesthetics.

  • An illustrator contributed visuals to strengthen the platform’s identity.

  • The development team implemented the final designs, ensuring the system worked seamlessly across different user scenarios.

Throughout this process, I continued to:

  • Collaborate with developers, addressing any UX challenges that arose during implementation.

  • Ensure alignment with user needs, making final refinements to key workflows.

  • Test and validate the platform, running final usability checks before launch.

Key Improvements & Impact

  • Streamlined Entry Management for Large Agencies – Big entrants can now link entries and share content across multiple submissions. Entries are organized into projects, allowing users to enter a project into multiple categories seamlessly.

  • Faster & More Flexible Entry Creation – Selecting categories is now quicker and easier, with a more streamlined submission process. A bulk entry functionality allows entrants to create multiple entries for a project in just a few steps.

  • More Intuitive Submission Flow – The entry form is now friendlier and more flexible, allowing users to jump between different sections (cards) and fill in information as needed, making the process smoother and more efficient.

  • Streamlined Entry Management for Large Agencies – Big entrants can now link entries and share content across multiple submissions. Entries are organized into projects, allowing users to enter a project into multiple categories seamlessly.

  • Faster & More Flexible Entry Creation – Selecting categories is now quicker and easier, with a more streamlined submission process. A bulk entry functionality allows entrants to create multiple entries for a project in just a few steps.

  • More Intuitive Submission Flow – The entry form is now friendlier and more flexible, allowing users to jump between different sections (cards) and fill in information as needed, making the process smoother and more efficient.

  • Enhanced Asset Management – A project gallery was introduced to help users easily upload and manage assets for their entries, reducing confusion and making the process more organized.

  • Simplified Credit Submission – Entrants can now reuse previously entered credits, eliminating the need to manually fill out the same information for each entry. This significantly reduces effort and speeds up the submission process.